Report for the 2010 WMO intercomparison of radiosonde systems in Yangjiang, China published

The report describing the results of the WMO Intercomparison of High Quality Radiosonde Systems, which took place in Yangjiang,  China between 12 July – 3 August 2010 has just been published. The report is available at

http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/publications/IOM-107_Yangjiang.pdf

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The 8th WMO Intercomparison of High Quality Radiosonde Systems held in China in July 2010 has produced a large data set on the performance of new operational radiosonde designs, backed up by measurements from Scientific Sounding Instrumentation. This was the result of China supporting this test very actively, and very good collaboration with the various manufacturers.

This allows recommendations as to the radiosonde designs that are potentially suitable for the GRUAN network operations and those which are suitable for routine operations, together with recommendations to improve systems without excessive development expenditure.

At night, most radiosonde systems can provide temperature measurements of suitable quality for both weather and climate work. In the day, many designs need improvement to the sensor exposure to improve the reproducibility of measurements near 10 hPa, and some further testing are needed to reduce the systematic bias between the various radiosondes at these upper levels. With more documentation, several systems have potential for use in GRUAN operations.

The relative humidity sensors tested in Yangjiang had good reproducibility, but several types had large systematic errors at all heights in the troposphere, and the origin of these needs to be identified and rectified as soon as possible. Several systems showed potential for observing relative humidity in the upper troposphere in the tropics, and the new correction schemes seem to have good potential for future observations. It was possible to check the measurements in cloud, using cloud radar (up to 15 km) and ceilometer observations (up to 12 km) to identify some of the clouds. Thus, with more documentation several systems have potential for use in GRUAN operations.

GPS height measurements are very reproducible, and are clearly suitable for all radiosonde operations, given that the equipment is initiated correctly. On the other hand, cheaper radiosondes may be used by exploiting systems such as the Chinese secondary radar for good quality operational results.

Thus, where GPS radiosondes are set up correctly, pressure can be deduced from the geopotential heights and the radiosonde measurements of temperature and relative humidity profile.

As a result of the test, many errors in the various quality radiosonde systems were identified and subsequently rectified ensuring improved accuracy for future radiosondes.

The Radiosonde Comparison was performed as a first collaboration between CIMO and a range of climate scientists associated with GCOS and GRUAN, as part of a WIGOS Pilot Project.

One Response to Report for the 2010 WMO intercomparison of radiosonde systems in Yangjiang, China published

  1. Peter Thorne says:

    Just to repeat pertinent parts of an email I sent to the GRUAN participants …

    Comparing it to the last one it is very clear to me that GRUAN involvement had a massive positive impact on experimental design and the science of the report. So, kudos to all of you. From a quasi-outsider perspective your involvement was hugely valuable.

    On a strategic viewpoint:

    Would it be worth requesting that in considering where the next intercomparison takes place GRUAN sites be actively considered given the wealth of remote sensing capability at many sites with a long heritage and necessary expertise?

    Do we want to request involvement from outset in planning and design
    of next intercomparison or is that an overhead too far compared to the
    benefits? Who would do this?

    I hope there are plans to spin one or more GRUAN-related papers off this rather than leaving solely in the grey literature?

    On a practical standpoint:
    1. Can we host a copy of the report on gruan.org and / or publicize it?
    Its nigh on impossible to find in the CIMO site without a link to follow.

    2. Is the database available? If so can we at a minimum link to it?

    3. I was somewhat disappointed to see only one satellite
    intercomparison. Is further work planned to make use of the collocations
    that Tony Reale produced?

    4. Should the raobs task team consider the nested balloons approach (pp.47)
    when considering the controlled ascent / descent paradigm as tasked at ICM3?

    Thanks again to all of you, but particularly Holger, on this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: